Britain in the second World War Essay Example for Free

Britain in the second World War Essay Britain in the second World War: the Evacuation of British Children Explain the differing reactions of people in Britain to the policy of evacuating children during the Second World War. There were a variety of reactions towards the evacuation of children in World War 2. Everyone was affected by the evacuation but the main reaction was that it was needed. I am going to look at different groups and what their reactions would have been towards the evacuation. Firstly I think I should look at the children themselves. Many children would have wanted the evacuation, as they would be concerned for their safety. Children would naturally be afraid of air bombings and the sound and sights of bombs would horrify them. If it meant they were safe Im sure they wouldnt mind leaving their homes. Well I definitely think that the more mature children would definitely not mind leaving. Many children then lived in poverty, and would not get to go on holiday; this would then be like a long holiday for them. Many children enjoyed the evacuation as they experienced new sights and new surroundings. An example of this is in the A Coursework Sources Booklet On : the evacuation of British children in the Second World War. On page 6 source 14, a boys says, instead of having to play cricket in the garden, we went bird nesting. This suggests that the boy did not enjoy playing cricket, but was enjoy himself more when evacuated. But Im not forgetting this is only the reaction of one boy. But there were some children who would get homesick or not enjoy themselves. This can be expected when you put young children into new surroundings and they would have been scared. In the booklet, page 4, source N it quotes And hot water from a tap. And there was a lavatory upstairs. And carpets. And something called an eiderdown. And clean sheets. This was all very odd. I didnt like it. it was scary. This shows that even though this person was now living in better conditions, they were not happy were they were and they would rather be home. I think it depended on your host. If you liked them, then you would likely enjoy yourself. If you didnt like them the majority hated it. I will now look at the reaction of the mothers. I think the majority of mothers would have felt the evacuation was correct and would have felt reassured that the Government was taking some action and getting the children to safety. The mothers would also like the evacuation because they would benefit. They could now concentrate more on work now and in the view of the economy this was an advantage of the evacuation. Knowing that their children were now safe and werent in danger of their school being bombed, they could work more efficiently and harder, therefore producing more artillery for example. If the mothers were working harder at work they would be tired at home and therefore if the children were away they wouldnt have to worry about them misbehaving, or getting into trouble, but they could now relax more. Also they would be better off financially, they may be getting better wages as they had time for over-time, and the didnt have to spend money on the children or as much food etc. But some mothers may not like it as much as others, as they may worry about their children being away from them. They may worry that their temporary parents did not treat them well or feed the well etc. Some may feel that they would be safer at home though this was obviously no the case). They may also find themselves very lonely, their husbands had gone and now their children, and there now would be less help around the house Also mothers are very protective of their children and they may worry that their children may get ill or hurt, and if this was the case they would feel they should be there to care for them. I now think it is appropriate to look at the reaction of the fathers. As with the mothers I feel the majority of fathers would welcome the evacuations, as they could respect that it was for their safety. They would welcome it as it would be very comforting knowing their children were safe, and they knew that if they felt this way they could fight with more heart, effort and overall increase moral. So contributing to the war effort.

College Sports - Todays Athletes are Privileged Perverts, Rapists, Thie

College Athletes - Privileged Perverts, Rapists, Thieves, Frauds, and Liars    In America today athletic events play an important role in the reflective perception and financial standing of any given community. It is for this reason that the individuals involved in these events are also of significance to the community. Due to the esteemed and very influential role placed on athletes they are often times given privileges that would not normally be given to them if they were not athletes. These privileges are given in order to recruit the athletes, and once recruited to maintain their status on the team so that, in turn, the team's status is not adversely affected. To understand the importance of the role of an athlete one must first examine the role of the athletic event in which the athlete participates and the level of importance placed on this event. Many communities see the local college athletic teams as a reflection of their society. It is therefore important to the community members that their team represents them in the best way possible. Due to American society being of a competitive nature, the basis on which democracy is built, the way a team's representation is judged is by its level of play. If a team is successful in its competitive meetings with other teams it asserts itself into a superior position over those teams. This in turn creates a sense of pride in the community because the team that represents them has beaten the teams that represent other communities. This develops a greater fan base and more support than if a team was to lose "because people aren't going to come watch a losing team" (qtd. in Suggs A42). This support is important to the team because this is where the team receives the majority o... ...ic ability and performance is based primarily on the athletes that participate in the athletic programs. In order to recruit and retain the best athletes for their college athletic programs coaches and colleges alike have made many exceptions and broken many rules. The preferential treatment of athletes is just one of the areas where these exceptions have been made. No matter the area where the exceptions are made these variances from the societal norm are brought about by the high demands and expectations placed on athletic teams to represent their community through success in competitive endeavors. Again, a team's level of success determines its level of community support and therefore determines its survival due to its need to be self-sufficient. Unfortunately the exceptions made and privileges given are often at the expense of the average student, the non-athlete.

Pomote Equality And Inclusion In Health And Social Care Essay

1.1 DIVERSITY- understanding that each individual is unique and recognizing individual differences. Diversity literally means difference. Diversity recognise that though people have things in common with each other they are also different and unique in many ways. Diversity is about recognising and valuing those differences. EQUALITY-to treat everyone the same treated equality. To ensure no one is being given special treatment to another person. To treat people in a way that is appropriate for their needs. INCLUSION- to ensure everyone is included. No one is left out or felt left out. All decision making to be all members. To ensure that all parties are felt included. 1.2 DISCRIMINATION- The prejudice treatment of an individual it involved behaviour towards people/groups based on their membership in a certain group or category- i.e. religion, sexuality, culture, age. see more:explain how legislation and codes of practice relating to equality diversity and discrimination Side effects :- Depression Anger Stress Isolation Suicide/self-harm Drinking Unable to perform duties Atmosphere Stress between colleagues Poor care 1.3 Working in an inclusive way helps support equality and diversity as it gives everyone a chance to show their individual differences but at the same time being equal. It’s important to do this so everyone feels included a sense of well-being that their opinion is valued. 2.1 Equality act 2006  (employment) religion or belief – it is unlawful to discriminate against people at work because of their religion or belief. Human rights act 1998 – covers many different types of discrimination some that are not covered by laws themselves Heath and social care act 2008—this act established the CQC who protect and promote the right of people using health and social care services they regulate the provision. Mental capacity act 2003—to protect anyone who has mental health condition. 3.3 Without a doubt I would challenge any kind of discrimination of a service user. I would ensure the service user is alright and speak to the person who is doing this. I would always have a 3rd party present for the safety of both parties. a written report to be made by both parties which would be given to the manger where further investigations would take place. Maybe handed over to H.R and developments happen from there i.e. suspensions, warnings, dismissal†¦.

The Theory Was Introduced By Stella Ting Toomey - 914 Words

ïÆ'Ëœ The theory was introduced by Stella Ting Toomey in 1985, a professor of human communication at California State University. ïÆ'Ëœ It states about the careful and imaginative administration of passionate dissatisfactions because of social or ethnic gathering enrollment character contrasts. ïÆ'Ëœ Negotiating is the to convince people around them to the point they need. ïÆ'Ëœ Negotiation doesn’t mean arguing or creating the point we like. It’s a discussion between people creating an agreement between them which is acceptable by both parties. NEGOTIATION The Art of Negotiation ïÆ'Ëœ Negotiation -â€Å"the art of making them take our method.† ïÆ'Ëœ Our Task -To recognize and mould your opponent’s perceived decisions, so that the opponent choose in their own concern something that you also need. Conflict: ïÆ'Ëœ The term conflict is termed to be a dispute that arise between two individuals that create a differences making them break their relation. ïÆ'Ëœ In any dispute, we just have to make negotiation to sort out the problem. Anyway, maintaining a good relation and getting a mutual benefit is the major criteria. ïÆ'Ëœ There are two kinds of people- collectivist and individualist. ïÆ'Ëœ Collectivist people try to solve conflicts in a compromising and accommodating way. ïÆ'Ëœ Individualistic people try to solve conflicts in a competing and aggressive way. NEGOTIATION STYLES Compete (I win - You lose) Competitive style Negotiators seek after their ownShow MoreRelatedAn Analysis of American – Chinese Movie ‘Saving Face† by Using Face Negotiation Theory1939 Words   |  8 PagesNegotiation Theory Table of contents Face Negotiation Theory 2 An application of face-negotiation theory in the movie â€Å"Saving face† (2004) 3 Advantages and disadvantages of face theory 6 Conclusion 7 References 8 The term â€Å"face-negotiation theory† was first introduced by Stella Ting-Toomey, a Professor of Human Communication Studies at California State University, in 1988 based on amazing works of Goffman in 1955 and Levinson and Brown in 1987 (Oetzel amp; Ting-Toomey 2003). AccordingRead MoreIntercultural vs. Cross-Cultural Communication2999 Words   |  12 Pages1). Intercultural communication focuses on â€Å"sharing of meanings† across cultures, whereas cross-cultural communication focuses on comparisons of communication styles. Using a variety of academic sources, evaluate both of these theories to determine which is the most useful for developing effective communication with people from other cultures. You may also draw on personal experience in the development of your argument. Everyone in this world is in one way or another influenced or affected by culture